About this news blog

The purpose of this blog is to allow the Ventracor Shareholder's Group to assist in the dissemination and sharing of information, and to allow legitimate debate on the items posted on the blog. No claim is made as to the accuracy or authenticity of the content.

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Stem cell firm axed in corporate cutback

Leigh Dayton has written an interesting story in The Australian which highlights what can happen to an Australian life sciences company when it gets bought by an overseas company.

June 04, 2009
Australia's first dedicated stem cell biotech firm, Melbourne's Stem Cell Sciences, is shutting down, a victim of budget-cutting by its new California-based owner.

Up to 10 mostly scientific positions will be lost, according to an announcement to be made today by StemCells Inc.

The Palo Alto-based firm has already acquired all SCS's intellectual property for handling embryonic stem cells, the new embryo-free stem cells, gene manipulation technology, existing licensing relationships and a portfolio of more than 20 patent families.

Until recently, there were four Australian stem cell firms: SCS, Bresagen, Embryonic Stemcells Inc and Mesoblast. Melbourne's Mesoblast is the last biotech standing, after Bresagen dropped stem cell work and ESI moved to Singapore.

"Hopefully, (Australia) can learn from the experience and rethink our participation in the innovation system," said SCS founder and former chief executive, Peter Mountford. He said he understood the Melbourne closure was a cost-cutting measure by SC Inc, and that he had been told the British arm of SCS would remain open.

Stem Cell Sciences managing director Paul Bello was unable to comment yesterday.
California's SC Inc bought SCS last March for about $5million and clearance of a $US715,000 loan to SCS. The sale came with the expectation that the 20 Australian and British staff would remain with StemCells.

Although Science Minister Kim Carr has announced that under this year's federal budget biotech firms would have access to about $1.4 billion a year through research and development tax incentives, Melbourne-based biotech analyst David Blake said the demise of SCS proved these measures were "too little, too late".

He claimed the sector had suffered under the Rudd Government, which had axed the Howard government's popular $700 million Commercial Ready program. It provided dollar-for-dollar funding to start-up companies able to attract other investment funds.

In March, Mr Blake reported in Bioshares Weekly that 11 of the 128 life science companies listed on the Australian Securities Exchange had left the sector or would do so shortly. Yesterday, he predicted this trend would get worse.

Senator Carr was unavailable for comment.

www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,25584042-23289,00.html

Disclaimer

All are invited to post constructive comments on all blog topics.

The comments on the blog may be monitored, and the Ventracor Shareholder's Group reserves the right not to post or remove or moderate any comments which in its opinionare unlawful, threatening, defamatory, offensive, or obscene.

This "blog" has links to information on other web sites. The opinions expressed in these linked articles are those of the relevant authors.

This "blog" allows anyone from the public to post comments. Any views expressed in these comments are those of the relevant author.

The Ventracor Shareholders Group does not endorse the views or opinions expressed in the linked articles or comments.

The Ventracor Shareholder's Group does not accept any responsibility for any injury, loss or damage incurred by use of or reliance on the information.Anyone who wishes to have a comment or link removed from the website should email contact@saveventracor.com immediately.